Latest News
Web Date: October 4, 2017

American Chemical Society wins preliminary finding against Sci-Hub

Judge says the distributor of pirated papers violated ACS’s copyright and trademark protections
Department: Government & Policy
Keywords: Publishing, ACS News, Sci-Hub, lawsuit

A U.S. district court in Alexandria, Va., has issued a preliminary finding supporting the American Chemical Society in its case against the internet pirate site Sci-Hub.

Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson agreed that Sci-Hub violated ACS’s copyright and trademark protections when it provided free access to stolen journal articles. ACS publishes C&EN.

“Sci-Hub’s actions merit a strong deterrent,” Anderson wrote. Sci-Hub should be ordered to stop distributing ACS’s copyrighted work and imitating its trademarked content, such as web pages, he recommended. Anderson also supported ordering internet service providers, such as search engines, domain name registries, or web hosting services, to stop distributing ACS content on Sci-Hub’s site. ACS should receive the $4.8 million in damages it requested, Anderson advised.

The filing is a recommendation to Judge Leonie M. Brinkema, who will issue a final ruling, likely within the next few months.

“ACS is pleased with the recent report filed by the magistrate judge. The Society is now awaiting a final judgment in the case,” says ACS spokesperson Glenn S. Ruskin.

Sci-Hub, which is thought to be based in Russia, is unlikely to follow the final ruling. A successful case against Sci-Hub by the publisher Elsevier did not stop Sci-Hub from publishing. However, a final ruling would allow ACS to go after the internet companies that host Sci-Hub’s content. That could make distributing ACS content slightly harder for Sci-Hub.

ACS filed suit against Sci-Hub in June. No Sci-Hub representatives attended a Sept. 22 hearing to defend themselves, so the ruling supported ACS by default.

 
Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
Comments
K (Thu Oct 05 08:21:51 EDT 2017)
Well, duh.
Richard (Thu Oct 05 19:04:41 EDT 2017)
Why don't we find a compromise and grant free access to literature if this literature needs to be referred to in an intended publication?

I mean this is basically extortion. If you don't pay for an article to read it, you can barely use it for a citation, but if you don't cite it, it could end in plagiarism.
P (Wed Nov 01 07:48:01 EDT 2017)
We pay tax dollars, tax dollars pay for research grants, research grants fund the research, then we have to pay to read the results?

Sounds to me like this knowledge is already paid for, so why isn’t free?

Don’t be too greedy ACS cause the times, they are a changing.
Leave A Comment