Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.


Persistent Pollutants

New electrochemical method detects PFOS and PFOA

Bubble nucleation is the basis for rapid and cost-effective analysis

by Emma Hiolski, special to C&EN
May 13, 2019

Credit: Courtesy of Long Luo
Nanoelectrodes (<100 nm diameter) are used to detect and quantify perfluorinated surfactants in solution through bubble nucleation at the electrode surface.

Bubbles and tiny electrodes may hold the key to faster, more cost-effective detection of perfluorinated surfactants that can contaminate drinking water. Researchers have developed an electrochemistry-based method to detect surfactants, specifically perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), with high sensitivity and specificity (Anal. Chem. 2019, DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01060).

Perfluorinated surfactants are highly stable due to perfluoroalkyl moieties, and are common in products like nonstick coatings and fire-fighting foam. Chronic exposure to two such perfluoroalkyl substances, PFOS and PFOA, has been linked to health issues in humans. Though these two chemicals are no longer used in industry, they persist in the environment and can contaminate drinking water.

Long Luo, an analytical chemist at Wayne State University, began his search for a novel way to detect these harmful chemicals after one such PFOS/PFOA contamination event in a Michigan town during the summer of 2018. The most commonly used detection method uses high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS), which requires complex instrumentation and can cost up to $300 per sample, Luo says. Hoping to develop a simpler, less expensive method, the team turned to electrochemistry.

Their method is based on a phenomenon known as electrochemical bubble nucleation. Applying electric potential to an electrode in an aqueous solution splits water into hydrogen gas and oxygen. Ramping up the current increases gas concentration near the electrode until a bubble forms, blocking the electrode surface and causing the current to drop. Surfactants reduce surface tension and make it easier for such bubbles to form, meaning the amount of current required to form those bubbles is inversely related to surfactant concentration.

To test their method, Luo and his collaborators fabricated tiny platinum electrodes less than 100 nm in diameter (smaller electrodes are more sensitive). The team could detect PFOS and PFOA concentrations as low as 80 µg/L and 30 µg/L, respectively. Preconcentrating samples using solid-phase extraction moved the limit of detection below 70 ng/L—the health advisory level for drinking water set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The method also remained sensitive and selective for surfactant detection even in the presence of a 1,000-fold greater concentration of poly(ethylene glycol), a nonsurfactant molecule with a molecular weight similar to that of PFOS.

Credit: C&EN
Credit: C&EN

“Electrochemical methods, in general, have great promise for measuring very low concentrations of contaminants in complex matrices,” says Michelle Crimi, an environmental engineer at Clarkson University. “I look forward to hearing more about the future of this technology, including its validation in field-contaminated water samples.”

Creating a handheld device for testing water in streams and other field sites—not just drinking water—is the ultimate goal, Luo says. An important step in that process will be developing a pretreatment phase to eliminate other surfactants that also promote bubble formation at electrodes, like sodium dodecyl sulfate. Such interference would be unlikely in drinking water samples, Luo says, because most compounds are not as stable as perfluoroalkyl substances and are destroyed during water treatment processing.



This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Dr Kristopher J. Elliott (May 15, 2019 2:42 PM)
This is an impressive analytical method. The technique remained selective for PFOS over poly(ethylene) glycol (a non surfactant molecule), however, would the technique become compromised if a residual surfactant molecule (such as those contained in personal care products or domestic cleaning products) was also present in the water sample undergoing PFOA/PFOS analysis?

One would envisage that these non- PFOA/PFOS surfactants, would also lower the surface tension making it easier for bubbles to form, causing the reported PFOA/PFOS concentration to be artificially high. The ability to de-convolute the PFOS/PFOA concentration from these non PFOA/PFOS surfactants would be a challenge.
Long LUO (May 23, 2019 3:30 PM)
Hi Kristopher,
Thanks for your interest in our research. You asked a great question. Regular surfactants like those in the personal care and cleaning products are nearly completely destroyed during the water treatment (unlike PFASs), so their concentrations are very low in drinking water. But there can be some regular surfactants in river water. We are currently working on evaluating the interference from these regular surfactants. Also, we have a backup plan to address this potential interference challenge.
Jeffrey Moorhead (October 21, 2019 7:59 PM)
Sounds like you are on the right track. Any idea on when it will be ready for the field and cost?

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment