If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.



EU court dismisses challenge to ban on sales of TVs with halogenated flame retardants

Tribunal rejects challenge by chemical industry group

by Cheryl Hogue
March 23, 2022


Two legs with feet clad in knit socks in front of a television.
Credit: Tero Vesalainen/Shutterstock
The European Union banned the sale of televisions containing brominated flame retardants.

A court has rejected a challenge by a chemical industry group to the European Union’s prohibition on the sale of televisions that contain halogenated flame retardants in their plastic cases.

The General Court of the EU ruled March 16 against the International Bromine Council (BSEF). The Brussels-based industry group consists of four companies that manufacture halogenated flame retardants: Albemarle, ICL Industrial Products, Lanxess, and Tosoh.

The BSEF sued over what it claims are technical flaws in the EU’s ban on sales of televisions, computer monitors, and other electronic devices encased in plastic that contains halogenated flame retardants. The prohibition took effect in 2021.

Halogenated flame retardants not bound to the structure of a polymer can migrate out of plastic. Exposure to these chemicals is linked to neurological injury in children as well as cancer, hormone disruption, and reproductive problems.

The European Commission, the EU’s executive body, enacted the ban to ensure the presence of brominated flame retardants doesn’t impede the recycling of plastics. The BSEF says the presence of brominated flame retardants doesn’t reduce the recyclability of plastic more than other types of flame retardants, such as organophosphates.

“If we want to create a truly circular economy, we need to focus on real barriers to recycling rather than incorrect ones,” Michael Hack, secretary general of the BSEF, says in an email.

The EU’s General Court dismissed all of the industry group’s arguments and ordered the BSEF to pay the legal costs the European Commission incurred to defend the ban.

New York is following the EU’s lead with a recent state law that, as of 2024, bans the sale of electronic goods in plastic cases with intentionally added organohalogens.



This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.