ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The trade war between the US and China is escalating. Caught in the middle, chemical makers say they would prefer both sides to talk through their differences rather than engage in a cycle of retaliation.
On Aug. 23, the Trump administration announced it is raising tariffs already imposed on $250 billion worth of Chinese imports from 25% to 30%, effective Oct. 1. The administration also said it will hike upcoming tariffs on $300 billion in Chinese goods from 10% to 15%. The $300 billion levy is set to go into effect in two batches on Sept. 1 and Dec. 15.
The measures are a retaliation for the Chinese government’s decision earlier this month to throw up tariffs of 5% and 10% on $75 billion in US exports. China was responding to the US decision to move forward with the 10% tariffs on $300 billion of imports.
“China’s adoption of tariff-adding measures is a forced move to deal with US unilateralism and trade protectionism,” the Chinese government said in a statement.
The chemical industry has been caught in the crossfire since the beginning of the trade war last year. The US tariffs already in place affect $15.4 billion in Chinese chemicals and plastics, while Chinese tariffs impact $10.8 billion in US chemical and plastic exports.
The American Chemistry Council, a chemical industry trade group, issued a rebuke of the US and Chinese governments for their handling of the trade dispute. “ACC and our members continue to believe that negotiation is more effective than intimidation and retaliation,” the statement said. “If this tariff dispute becomes a war of attrition, it has the potential to last for years, only doing more harm than good—to both sides.”
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X