ADVERTISEMENT
4 /5 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Industrial Safety

Arkema indicted for fires, chemical releases following Tropical Storm Harvey

Organic peroxides decomposed and ignited after plant lost power and refrigeration

by Randy Lee Loftis
August 6, 2018

20180806lnp1-arkema.jpg
Credit: Adrees Latif/Reuters/Newscom
Flooding from Tropical Storm Harvey caused Arkema's Crosby, Texas, plant to lose power and refrigeration, leading to decomposition of organic peroxides and fires.

A grand jury in Houston indicted Arkema and two of its executives Friday on criminal charges that they “recklessly” failed to prevent fires and releases from a chemical plant near Houston last year during catastrophic flooding from Tropical Storm Harvey.

Reactive organic peroxides decomposed and caught fire after floodwaters knocked out power and disabled refrigeration at Arkema’s Crosby, Texas, plant. The chemicals must be kept cool to remain stable.

In addition to the company, the indictment names Richard Rowe, CEO of Arkema’s North America operations, as well as plant manager Leslie Comardelle. If convicted, Arkema could face $1 million in fines and the executives could face five years in prison.

“Companies don’t make decisions, people do,” Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, whose office sought the indictment, said in a statement. “Responsibility for pursuing profit over the health of innocent people rests with the leadership of Arkema.”

The defendants’ attorneys said the indictment has no legal, factual, or historical basis. Prosecuting a company for the impacts of an unprecedented natural disaster for which local officials weren’t prepared “would set an ominous precedent,” Rusty Hardin, Arkema’s attorney, said in a statement.

Rowe’s attorneys, Tim Johnson and Nick Dickerson, said that “while Mr. Rowe proudly leads the women and men who are the Arkema family, acts of God are outside of his domain.”

Comardelle and his crew “acted heroically, working around the clock throughout the storm, trying to protect the plant and the public,” said his attorneys, Paul Nugent and Heather Peterson.

“The prosecutor’s decision to pursue this course of action is discouraging and sets an alarming and unreasonable precedent of seeking to hold people responsible for acts of nature,” said the chemical industry group American Chemistry Council in a statement.

About 2 meters of floodwater shut down the plant’s power and refrigeration in late August of 2017, putting nearly 159,000 kg of organic peroxides at risk of catching fire. Workers moved chemicals to nine refrigerated trailers, but three trailers ignited and Arkema eventually burned the others to end the emergency. The release caused 21 people to seek medical care.

The U.S. Chemical Safety & Hazard Investigation Board concluded in May that while Arkema had safety systems, “all of these layers of protection failed” due to flooding. The board called industry guidelines on flooding inadequate and warned that companies must plan for more frequent extreme rainfall and other weather events due to climate change.

“These potential prison sentences and fines should spur Arkema and other chemical companies to develop and maintain robust contingency plans in anticipation of natural disasters,” said Bay Scoggin, state director of the Texas Public Interest Research Group, an environmental advocacy organization. “Without responsible planning, we could again end up with tragic consequences for brave first responders and people who happen to live close by.”

Advertisement

The next court hearing in the criminal case is scheduled for Oct. 22. First responders, Harris and Liberty Counties, and residents of the area around the plant have filed civil suits against the company.

BP also faced criminal charges for a 2005 explosion that killed 15 workers and injured nearly 200 others at its Texas City refinery. It wound up paying a $50 million fine for violating the Clean Air Act. That was the last time a chemical company faced criminal charges for an incident in Texas, the Houston Chronicle reports.

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Comments
Janet Greenberg (Wed Aug 08 18:20:47 EDT 2018)
Being a Houstonian that was actively watching the news during Hurricane Harvey, my recollection is that Arkema was absolutely forthcoming regarding the impending problem. This was not an emergency that occurred immediately because of a failure to have proper control systems in place. This was a situation that occurred when, after a period of days, the primary containment would no longer suffice. Arkema alerted nearby landowners that fires would be occurring, so that they could evacuate. They gave adequate prior notice for the safety of those in surrounding areas. I am saddened that our society is so litigious that we cannot come together and recognize when individuals who were open and honest and did their best are NOT culpable for another's misfortune. Numerous people were affected by Harvey, and many lives were turned upside down. But sometimes it's just a raw deal for those that were affected, and there is no one to sue.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment