ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
n a case that began seven years ago, the Supreme Court of Canada now has ruled that a Saskatchewan farmer violated Monsanto’s patent on herbicide-resistant Roundup Ready canola by illegally using the modified crop. The case strengthens intellectual property rights for makers of genetically modified organisms.
The 5-to-4 decision, which upholds the decisions of two lower courts, said that the farmer, Percy Schmeiser, had actually cultivated Monsanto’s Roundup Ready canola without ever buying the seed or paying the license fee. Monsanto charges that Schmeiser therefore infringed on the company’s patent. Tests determined that Schmeiser’s canola crop—about 1,000 acres in 1998—consisted of more than 95% Roundup Ready canola. Schmeiser insisted that seeds for the modified crop had blown onto his property or fallen off passing trucks.
Monsanto will not profit from the decision. The court held that Schmeiser did not have to give the company nearly $15,000 he had made in profits from the crop, nor did he have to pay its legal costs.
In a statement, Monsanto Executive Vice President Carl M. Casale said: “We believe the Supreme Court of Canada decision is good news for Canadians. The court has set a world standard in intellectual property protection, and this ruling maintains Canada as an investment opportunity.”
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter