Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Environment

Activists Oppose DOE Plan for Plutonium

October 31, 2005 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 83, Issue 44

Nearly three dozen activist groups are calling on the Energy Department to draft a new environmental impact statement for plutonium consolidation at Idaho National Laboratory, arguing that an assessment issued in July underestimates the risk that workers would be contaminated under the current plan. “The plutonium impact statement was completely inadequate, and if we proceed with what DOE is proposing, there will be accidents and there will be contamination,” says Jeremy Maxand, executive director of the Snake River Alliance, an Idaho-based nuclear watchdog group. In an Oct. 17 statement, the groups expressed particular concern with the “likelihood” of workers being exposed to deadly isotopes. As recently as 2003, they note, workers at DOE's Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico were contaminated with plutonium, which is used in radioisotope power systems to generate heat and electricity for NASA spacecraft and satellites. DOE currently has radioisotope power system programs at its Idaho, Los Alamos, and Oak Ridge laboratories. DOE wants to consolidate these operations at the Idaho lab, which it describes as “highly secure,” and says the radiological impact on workers and the general public would be “small and well below regulatory limits.”

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.