ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
I agree with most of the points made in the article "Piercing the Veil of Creativity" except for Anthony J. Le Storti's views on skunk works (C&EN, July 3, page 40). It has its place when there is a clearly defined goal and very competent corporate management. It has no value as a "showplace" with only vague goals of good science. It also has become difficult to recruit team members because it is usually an ad hoc mission, and membership means you do not fit into a line organization.
James W. Reeves
Wilmington, Del.
"Piercing the Veil of Creativity" reminded me of professor Colin Fink in my 1940 electrochemistry course at Columbia University. He told of the problem of corrosion of copper bus bars preventing electrical contact with the plating racks. The problem was solved by a worker with no scientific training who suggested greasing the bus bars. Engineers would not suggest this because they know grease is an insulator. It is an example of the "provocative jolt" cited in the article. It is why Fink said we should always have an untrained employee to come up with "no-sense, stupid, impractical ideas," which often work.
Saul Ricklin
Bristol, R.I.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter