Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Policy

Novartis loses patent dispute

February 6, 2006 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 84, Issue 6

Novartis lost a patent case against Cipla in India over its cancer drug Gleevec when the Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks ruled that the drug is not an invention that it recognizes. There have been few rulings on pharmaceutical patent cases since last year when India introduced a new system that protects pharmaceutical compound patents. One technicality of the new system is that it only recognizes patents filed in India after 1995. In the Gleevec case, the patent office ruled that the key invention in the drug was protected by a patent filed in 1993. According to the controller's office, a patent Novartis filed in 1998 for a crystal modification of the free base of the drug does not qualify as an invention. Cipla will reportedly file for removal of an injunction against marketing its generic form of the drug.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.