ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
On June 15, the House approved a fiscal 2008 spending bill for the Department of Homeland Security that includes a provision that would permit states and local governments to enact chemical plant security regulations that are more stringent than federal standards. The $36.3 billion budget measure has drawn a veto threat from the White House because it exceeds President George W. Bush's request for the department by $2.1 billion. The White House also objects to language added to the bill that would allow state and local regulations to exceed federal rules on chemical plant security, saying the provision could conflict with or hinder DHS's own security requirements. In April, DHS issued an interim final chemical plant security rule that gave the department the authority to block state or local requirements if they conflict with or "frustrate the purpose" of the federal program. The American Chemistry Council supports the DHS regulation as it is and says further action by Congress is unnecessary.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter