ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The National Research Council says the White House should scrap its controversial draft guidelines for risk assessment within the federal government. The White House Office of Management & Budget described the draft guidelines as "clear, minimum standards for the scientific quality of federal agency risk assessments" when it released them in January 2006 (C&EN, Jan. 16, 2006, page 6). Agencies, however, said the guidelines would snarl government activities. After reviewing the guidelines at OMB's behest, NRC determined they were "fundamentally flawed," according to a report released on Jan. 11. "We began our review of the draft bulletin thinking we would only be recommending changes, but the more we dug into it, the more we realized that from a scientific and technical standpoint, it should be withdrawn altogether," said John F. Ahearne, chair of the NRC committee that wrote the report and director of the ethics program at Sigma Xi, a scientific research society. The report is available at www.nap.edu/catalog/11811.html.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter