Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Policy

Not A Disability

October 15, 2007 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 85, Issue 42

The articles on chemists with disabilities reminded me of when I was a student at Brooklyn Technical High School in the early 1940s (C&EN, July 23, page 36). At the time, passing a test for color blindness was a prerequisite for taking chemistry courses. Fortunately, I passed the test.

Owing to the wartime shortage of workers when I graduated in 1943, I worked as a lab tech until I turned 18 and then entered the Army. The experience of a few months in a lab reinforced my intention to become a chemist, which I kept in mind throughout my military service. Had I failed the color-blindness test, I probably would have followed a different career, and I doubt that I would have enjoyed it as much.

I've never seen a good reason for the color-vision requirement. Perhaps I couldn't have done titrations with certain indicators, but there were options even then. Most likely, the people who established the requirement saw only the problems that a color-blind chemist might encounter instead of seeing the possibilities.

Marvin Margoshes
Hastings on Hudson, N.Y.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.