Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Policy

'Chemistry Behind Bars'

March 10, 2008 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 86, Issue 10

I initially missed Patrick Achord's letter (C&EN, Nov. 26, 2007, page 5) criticizing the prison program (C&EN, Oct. 22, 2007, page 17) but was gratified to read April Hill's response (C&EN, Jan. 28, page 9). Please allow me to second her remarks from a slightly different perspective.

As a retired research chemist, I have been a volunteer tutor since 2006 in the General Education Development (GED) program run under the auspices of Painesville, Ohio, Adult Basic & Literacy Education (ABLE). We prepare students for the GED exams, working mornings in the ABLE facilities and afternoons in the Lake County Jail.

Our program in the jail has the support of the county sheriff's department. Far from being concerned about releasing better educated criminals into the community, as Achord seems to fear, we are attempting to equip those released with skills they can use to work within the community rather than returning to jail or "graduating" to prison. In fact, some sentences even include obtaining the GED as a requirement to be considered for probation.

Surely, helping those in jail contribute productively to society after their release, rather than being a drain on the community, is a worthwhile endeavor.

Stephen H. Stoldt
Painesville, Ohio

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.