ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Last week, Rhode Island's Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling that found three makers of lead-based paints and pigments liable for covering up the health risks of their products. The 2006 ruling could have forced Sherwin-Williams, NL Industries, and Millennium Holdings to pay billions of dollars to clean up and contain paint in the state. The state's top court ruled that Rhode Island officials failed to prove the companies interfered with a public right or that the firms were in control of the products when they caused harm to Rhode Island children. "However grave the problem of lead poisoning is in Rhode Island, public nuisance law simply does not provide a remedy for this harm," the court said in a 4-to-0 opinion. The case, which has been compared to tobacco lawsuits, is being watched closely by other states and municipalities.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X