ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, in New York City, has upheld the dismissal of lawsuits by Vietnam War veterans who want compensation for injuries caused by exposure to agent orange during the war and by Vietnamese citizens who want the chemical companies that made agent orange to compensate them for health problems thought to be caused by it. The veterans' cases were dismissed because the court ruled that contractors for the government are protected from tort liability associated with the performance of their contracts. The Vietnam citizens' claims are based on reports that many of them have ailments caused by exposure to agent orange, including miscarriages, birth defects, breast cancer, lung cancer, and Hodgkin's disease. They want the companies to pay for health care and for environmental cleanup in Vietnam. The court ruling says the companies cannot be held liable for these problems under international law because the herbicide was used to defoliate trees, not as poison against humans. More than a dozen chemical companies were defendants, including Dow Chemical, Monsanto, Occidental Chemical, Harcros Chemicals, and Uniroyal Chemicals. Agent orange was used for several years in Vietnam and was contaminated with low-parts-per-million levels of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, which is alleged to have caused the illnesses.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter