ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The House Science & Technology Subcommittee on Technology & Innovation held a hearing on March 10 to look at the status of forensic science. The hearing was in response to a National Academies’ report (C&EN, Feb. 23, page 7), and it looked at the report’s recommendation to create a new independent agency to lead forensic science efforts. The new agency would provide oversight and quality assurance, according to the report. Some in Congress are hesitant to support such a plan. “I would like to explore how we can build upon and improve existing federal capabilities rather than trying to create a whole new government structure,” Subcommittee Chairman David Wu (D-Ore.) said. The hearing explored the potential role NIST could play in an alternative scenario to the Academies’ recommendation. More hearings are expected.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter