Advertisement
Grab your lab coat. Let's get started
Welcome!
Welcome!
Create an account below to get 6 C&EN articles per month, receive newsletters and more - all free.
It seems this is your first time logging in online. Please enter the following information to continue.
As an ACS member you automatically get access to this site. All we need is few more details to create your reading experience.
Not you? Sign in with a different account.
Not you? Sign in with a different account.
ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Business
Tate & Lyle Has Sucralose Setback
by Lisa M. Jarvis
April 13, 2009
| A version of this story appeared in
Volume 87, Issue 15
Tate & Lyle has had another setback in its battle to stave off Chinese competition on the sweetener sucralose. The International Trade Commission has upheld an earlier ruling in favor of Chinese manufacturers of sucralose, which Tate & Lyle markets in the U.S. as Splenda. Although the patent on the molecule has expired, Tate & Lyle claims to have intellectual property covering all novel manufacturing processes for sucralose. The company plans to explore options for further appeals.
The power is now in your (nitrile gloved) hands
Sign up for a free account to get more articles. Or choose the ACS option that’s right for you.
Already have an ACS ID? Log in
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter