Advertisement
Grab your lab coat. Let's get started
Welcome!
Welcome!
Create an account below to get 6 C&EN articles per month, receive newsletters and more - all free.
It seems this is your first time logging in online. Please enter the following information to continue.
As an ACS member you automatically get access to this site. All we need is few more details to create your reading experience.
Not you? Sign in with a different account.
Not you? Sign in with a different account.
ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Environment
Mercury Emissions
May 25, 2009
| A version of this story appeared in
Volume 87, Issue 21
I BELIEVE there may be an error in the last paragraph of "Quitting Quicksilver" (C&EN, March 2, page 13). Mercury emissions can affect the concentration of mercury in inland bodies of water like lakes or even saltwater bays. In these waters, mercury can accumulate in fish. It is doubtful that it can affect the oceans. The oceans average 4,000 meters deep and cover 70% of Earth's surface. Even thousands of tons of mercury won't increase oceans' natural background level of mercury, which accounts for its presence in some fish. I think it is important to correct the statement. The popular press picks up on this sort thing.
Mike McHenry
Washington, N.J.
You might also like...
The power is now in your (nitrile gloved) hands
Sign up for a free account to get more articles. Or choose the ACS option that’s right for you.
Already have an ACS ID? Log in
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X