ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Scientists have long puzzled over why violins and cellos made by the 18th-century masters Antonio Stradivari and Joseph Guarneri del Gesù of Cremona, Italy, sound so superior to other instruments. Ideas abound: It's the wood; it's the varnish; it's the glue. Joseph Nagyvary, a biochemistry professor emeritus at Texas A&M University and violin maker, has argued for decades that chemical treatments used to protect the wood from worms and fungus are the true source of the famed Cremonese sound. Now, Nagyvary and Texas A&M colleagues Renald N. Guillemette and Clifford H. Spiegelman have new evidence to support that argument (PLoS One, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004245). The researchers used electron imaging, X-ray methods, and other techniques to examine samples from four instruments made by Stradivari and Guarneri, as well as instruments made during the same period in other parts of Europe. The Cremonese instruments "showed the unmistakable signs of chemical treatments in the form of chemicals which are not present in natural woods," the authors report. The chemicals identified include borax, BaSO4, CaF2, and ZrSiO4. Untreated, natural wood might not be the right material for violin makers hoping to duplicate the Cremona sound, the authors suggest.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter