ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The chemical industry is asking the Nevada Supreme Court to reconsider its July decision to uphold a $32 million verdict against Goodyear Tire & Rubber in a product liability case. The state’s top court endorsed a jury trial’s judgment stemming from a 2004 incident in which a van rolled over, killing three people and injuring seven others. In court papers filed jointly with other business groups, the American Chemistry Council contends that the district court erred when it denied Goodyear an opportunity to present its defense and the judge instructed the jury to consider the company liable for damages. Judge Sally L. Loehrer ruled that the tire maker could not challenge its liability after finding that Goodyear stalled and obstructed the pretrial process. But ACC argues that Goodyear’s right to due process was violated. “Chemical companies are a frequent target in product liability litigation,” says ACC Deputy General Counsel Donald D. Evans. “This is a deeply troubling precedent for the chemical industry and the entire business community.”
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X