ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The first in-depth environmental analysis of electric cars that use lithium-ion batteries has been published, and the researchers have found that electric vehicles win out over their gasoline-fueled counterparts (Environ. Sci. Technol., DOI: 10.1021/es903729a). Some experts have been concerned that the environmental costs of manufacturing and disposing of electric-vehicle batteries might negate any benefits from reduced hydrocarbon fuel emissions. Dominic A. Notter of the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science & Technology and colleagues performed a life-cycle analysis of lithium-ion batteries to address those concerns. They determined that 15% of an electric car’s total environmental burden comes from mining, manufacturing, and disposing of the battery’s metal parts, mainly the copper and aluminum components. The largest burden—45% of the costs—stems from generating electricity to recharge the batteries. Overall, the team calculated that a gas-powered car would need a fuel economy of 60 to 80 mpg to shrink its environmental footprint to that of an electric vehicle.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter