ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
EPA’s proposed regulations for limiting emissions of toxic air pollutants from industrial boilers and process heaters are “far more stringent than necessary” to protect public health and the environment, says the American Chemistry Council, an industry trade group. In comments filed with the agency, ACC also expresses concern that EPA is “significantly underestimating” the costs the rules would impose on industry. ACC argues that EPA’s proposed standards for boilers and process heaters are “fundamentally flawed” because the agency analyzed emissions of various pollutants individually rather than evaluating the facilities’ emissions as a whole. “EPA cherry-picks the best data in setting each standard, without regard for sources,” says Mike Walls, ACC’s vice president of technical and regulatory affairs. The result, he says, is a set of “unachievable standards” that do not reflect the “actual performance of real sources.” EPA estimates that the total capital cost of complying with the new regulations will be $9.5 billion. But ACC believes the figure will exceed $20 billion for industry overall, with $3.8 billion in costs for chemical manufacturers.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter