ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
New EPA guidelines lay out criteria for comparing the safety of chemical substances that are possible alternatives to chemicals currently in use that may pose a concern to human health or the environment. The agency’s benchmarks include health considerations such as carcinogenicity or neurotoxicity and environmental factors including persistence and bioaccumulation. The agency’s Design for the Environment program will use the criteria to assess alternatives for six controversial substances or classes of compounds: bisphenol A, decabromodiphenyl ether, hexabromocyclododecane, nonylphenol, nonylphenol ethoxylates, and phthalates. The program evaluates data for chemicals that are potential alternatives to less safe substances and assigns each a hazard level of high, moderate, or low for human health and environmental concerns. Steve Owens, EPA assistant administrator for chemical safety and pollution prevention, says the new criteria represent “an important step toward ensuring that the chemicals used in this country are safe. Making this information available will not only lead to the manufacture of safer products, it will increase the public’s access to critical chemical information.”
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter