Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Energy

Federal Court Ruling Backs Pay For Delay

by Glenn Hess
March 1, 2010 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 88, Issue 9

A federal court in Atlanta has dismissed a Federal Trade Commission lawsuit alleging that Solvay Pharmaceuticals conspired with several generic drug manufacturers to postpone generic competition for its testosterone-replacement drug AndroGel. Last year, FTC charged that Solvay had entered into an illegal agreement with Watson Pharmaceuticals and Par Pharmaceutical and paid them a share of its AndroGel profits in return for a promise that they would not introduce a generic competitor until 2015.The generic companies also agreed to drop their challenge to Solvay's patent for the drug, which expires in 2020 (C&EN, Feb. 9, 2009, page 24). FTC has long opposed such "pay for delay" arrangements, arguing that they violate antitrust law and cost U.S. consumers billions of dollars annually. But U.S. District Court Judge for the Northern District of Georgia Thomas W. Thrash Jr. dismissed FTC's challenge, citing previous court rulings that allowed settlements similar to the one reached by the drugmakers in this case. "This decision, along with several other prior court decisions in similar suits brought by FTC, reaffirms the procompetitive and proconsumer nature of patent settlements," says Kathleen Jaeger, president of the Generic Pharmaceutical Association, an industry trade group.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.