ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
The results of taxpayer-funded scientific research should be free to be accessed immediately upon publication, a report commissioned by the U.K. government concludes. The report recommends that publishers adopt open-access models over the next few years, particularly models that charge authors fees to offset publication costs. The long-awaited document is called the Finch report, after Janet Finch, a sociologist at the University of Manchester, in England, and chair of the group behind the report. It states that the transition to open access will be complex and “no single channel can on its own maximise access to research publications for the greatest number of people.” Even so, the report favors a transition to what it calls “gold” open access, with authors paying publication charges to have their work freely accessible, as opposed to “green” open access, with publishers allowing access to journal articles for free after an embargo period of about six to 12 months. Publishers in the U.K. welcome the report, but open-access advocates say that, to sustain the profits of publishers, the report overlooks potentially cheaper ways to achieve open access.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter