ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Reducing methane and soot (black carbon) emissions along with carbon dioxide could more effectively rein in projected global warming than a CO2-only reduction strategy, according to a climate modeling study (Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.1210026). A team led by Drew T. Shindell at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies at Columbia University screened hundreds of pollution-control measures and identified 14 cost-effective strategies that could collectively reduce the impact of CH4 and soot emissions by 90% by 2030. Methane interacts with nitrogen oxides to make tropospheric ozone, and soot settles on ice and snow—both species trap heat and are air pollutants. The researchers found that implementing the 14 strategies, which include aeration of flooded rice paddies and using diesel particulate filters in vehicles, could reduce warming by 0.5 °C by 2050. This reduction would keep mean global warming to less than 2 °C until 2070, relative to the preindustrial mean temperature. Climate scientists believe 2 °C warming is the approximate threshold at which disruptive climate changes will begin. As an added benefit, soot reduction would prevent several million annual premature deaths from air pollution, and ozone reduction would increase crop yields by tens of millions of metric tons per year, Shindell and coworkers estimate.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X