ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Three new studies flesh out, and possibly resolve complications in, the theory that the moon formed when a giant body collided with Earth (Nature, DOI: 10.1038/nature11507; Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.1225542 and 10.1126/science.1226073). Although the impact formation idea has been popular since the 1970s, more recently discovered chemical similarities between Earth and the moon are hard to reconcile with the idea that the moon was created from remnants of a separate body. But two new simulations paint plausible scenarios. One model, from Matija ćuk and Sarah T. Stewart of Harvard University, simulates a small planet about half the mass of Mars striking a rapidly spinning young Earth. Another, from Robin M. Canup of Southwest Research Institute, simulates a much larger impact by a body the size of Earth itself. Both models produced moons chemically similar to Earth. In another study, Frédéric Moynier of Washington University in St. Louis finds that heavy zinc isotopes are more abundant on the moon than on Earth, bolstering the notion that volatile substances were purged from a nascent moon after a violent impact. In addition, this discovery could temper the hope, spurred by recent discoveries of hydrated lunar minerals, that the moon’s interior could be rich in water.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X