ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
After a review of a decade’s worth of biofuel research, Environmental Protection Agency scientists have concluded that knowledge gaps will likely prevent experts from adequately assessing the full environmental impact of increased biofuel use (Environ. Sci. Technol., DOI: 10.1021/es2023253). Caroline E. Ridley of EPA’s National Center for Environmental Assessment and her colleagues searched literature databases and identified more than 1,600 biofuel research citations from 2000 to 2009. They assigned each study to one of four themes, such as the environment or economics, and then to topics within those themes, such as greenhouse gas emissions or costs of production. The team found that the most common topics, with a few hundred papers each, were fuel production, feedstock production, and greenhouse gas emissions. At the bottom of the list, 80 studies examined how biofuel production affects biodiversity, and only 15 studied the human health impacts of increasing levels of air pollutants produced by burning bioethanol. Ridley’s team warns that these holes in basic research mean that expanded use of biofuels could lead to unanticipated problems. Ridley suggests the citation analysis could offer a guide to decisionmakers when allotting research funds for future studies.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter