ADVERTISEMENT
2 /3 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Materials

Designing Proteins From Scratch

Rules integrate structure and function, enabling scientists to design better protein catalysts

by Celia Henry Arnaud
December 24, 2012 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 90, ISSUE 52

[+]Enlarge
Credit: Adapted from Nature
Design rules yield a predicted protein structure (red) that closely matches its actual structure (blue).
09052-cover2-structure.jpg
Credit: Adapted from Nature
Design rules yield a predicted protein structure (red) that closely matches its actual structure (blue).

Most efforts to design protein catalysts start with an existing protein and modify it to perform a new function. But the reconfigured proteins usually don’t work as well as hoped. A set of rules developed this year by David Baker of the University of Washington, Gaetano T. Montelione of Rutgers University, and coworkers helps protein designers build better catalysts by integrating structure and function together from the ground up (C&EN, Nov. 12, page 8; Nature, DOI: 10.1038/nature11600). The design rules describe the junctions between adjacent structural elements such as α-helices and β-strands. The rules, which are mostly independent of amino acid sequence, depend on the chirality of ββ units and the orientation of αβ and βα units in the proteins. These characteristics are dictated by the length of the structural elements and the loops that connect them. Once the correct backbone has been determined, simulations identify the best sequence. Baker and coworkers used their rules to design a variety of proteins. Volunteers in the distributed computing project Rosetta@home predicted the lowest energy structure for each of the proteins. Baker and his colleagues then chose five proteins in which the predicted structure matched the designed structure, expressed them in bacteria, and obtained their structures using NMR spectroscopy. The actual structures matched the designed structures. The next step for the team is adding catalytic sites to these protein scaffolds.

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment