ADVERTISEMENT
2 /3 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Business

Whistle-Blower Wins $8 Million In Pigment Dumping Case

U.S. CEO helps government make case against Japanese firm

by Alexander H. Tullo
December 24, 2012 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 90, ISSUE 52

A whistle-blower is nearly $8 million richer after helping the U.S. government establish an antidumping case against a Japanese ink manufacturer. Toyo Ink is paying $45 million to settle a suit filed by the government and John Dickson, CEO of Fort Mill, S.C.-based Nation Ford Chemical, alleging that Toyo imported carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP-23) under false pretenses to avoid paying duties.

Importers of Indian and Chinese CVP-23 must pay antidumping duties. The government alleges that Toyo misrepresented CVP-23 from these countries as being made in Japan or Mexico, which are not subject to the duties. Although the government acknowledges that Toyo’s CVP-23 underwent a finishing process in Japan and Mexico before it was sent to the U.S., it says these steps were insufficient to change the country of origin.

Dickson, whose company produces CVP-23, says his sleuthing sniffed out the fraudulence of Toyo’s pigment origin claims. “I had sufficient industry knowledge to know this was unlikely to be true,” he says. “Nevertheless, it was necessary for me to expend literally thousands of hours obtaining Chinese export data and other information.”

Dickson filed a suit on behalf of the government under the False Claims Act in federal court in North Carolina in 2009. As a result, he is entitled to 17.5% of the settlement, or $7.875 million. Dickson says the money will “inure to the benefit of workers” at his South Carolina plant.

For its part, Toyo admits to no wrongdoing. But after considering the cost of litigating the case, the company says, it “reached a decision that a settlement was the best choice.”

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Comments
ajitabh (December 25, 2012 7:27 AM)
prejudiced judgement.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment