ADVERTISEMENT
2 /3 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Environment

Ensuring Boeing’s Lithium-Ion Battery Safety

June 17, 2013 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 91, ISSUE 24

As a chemist, I am appalled by mainstream media reports that investigators remain unsure about the causes for lithium-ion batteries catching fire onboard Boeing jets. Lithium-ion battery safety—or the lack thereof—is a matter of fundamental chemistry that must be addressed by Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Known, reliable tests such as accelerated rate calorimetry (ARC) can determine whether the batteries will produce a chaotic runaway reaction.

As one of the strongest known reducing agents, lithium might very well cause an autocatalytic reaction with the carbonyl solvent chosen for the new batteries (J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999, DOI: 10.1149/1.1391893). Readily available ARC testing can determine the onset temperature and increase in pressure of any such reaction and provide the chemical understanding needed for certifying the safety of airline passengers. It is critical that the new Boeing batteries be tested using this premier standard.

Monitoring the batteries’ behavior in flight, as has been proposed, will do nothing to stop a potential burnout if the reaction cannot be prevented in the first place. Modifying the environment of the batteries with insulation could possibly exacerbate overheating to a critical temperature. Before commercial flights with these lithium-ion batteries onboard resume, Boeing, FAA, and the scientific community must ensure that all scientific protocols have been thoroughly investigated and made public.

A. Bryan Lees
Union, N.J.

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Comments
R C (Chris) Baskerville (June 17, 2013 7:52 AM)
Quite right. The exact chemical reaction that leads to this internal short circuiting must be determined, and then verified by experimental procedures, by therby inducing such fires to occur under controlled laboratory conditions. The exact climatic and pollutant environmental conditions that are necessary for such fires to take place, have indeed been suggested to the concerned parties, which on being recognised as being totally valid, can then be ameleriorated, by implementing the required counter-measures such that fires within lithium-ion batteries should never happen, whether on the Dreamliner 787 or when being carried as air freight. However fires within personal lap tops containing lithium-ion batteries,especially those in use by crew and passengers, will still occur when ever these environmental conditions are replicated, and are more of a problem, to which I can see no easy solution. RCB (Pollution Research Chemist)

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment