Advertisement
Grab your lab coat. Let's get started
Welcome!
Welcome!
Create an account below to get 6 C&EN articles per month, receive newsletters and more - all free.
It seems this is your first time logging in online. Please enter the following information to continue.
As an ACS member you automatically get access to this site. All we need is few more details to create your reading experience.
Not you? Sign in with a different account.
Not you? Sign in with a different account.
ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Policy
Feuding Firms Both Claim Legal Victories
by Michael McCoy
June 24, 2013
| A version of this story appeared in
Volume 91, Issue 25
U.S.-based SI Group and China’s Sino Legend Chemical are both claiming victories in a legal dispute over technology for making tire tackifier resins. In the U.S., an International Trade Commission judge determined that Sino Legend has misappropriated SI trade secrets, a decision that SI says will block exports of Sino Legend products to the U.S. But in China, Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People’s Court ruled in favor of Sino Legend in two cases, concluding that SI’s claims of trade secret theft had no factual or legal basis.
The power is now in your (nitrile gloved) hands
Sign up for a free account to get more articles. Or choose the ACS option that’s right for you.
Already have an ACS ID? Log in
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter