Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Policy

House Panel Probes Chemical Law

by Cheryl Hogue
June 24, 2013 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 91, Issue 25

Signaling an interest in reforming the U.S. law that governs commercial chemicals, a House of Representatives Energy & Commerce subpanel in mid-June kicked off a series of hearings on the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Among the issues discussed at the first hearing was TSCA’s mandate that EPA demonstrate that it has selected the least burdensome regulatory alternative when it bans or requires labeling for a substance. Lawmakers also raised concern about confidential business information provisions in TSCA. Under other federal laws, firms seeking protections must substantiate their trade secret assertions, the agency receiving the information must verify confidentiality claims, and the public must have an opportunity to challenge firms’ claims, noted Rep. Diana L. DeGette (D-Colo.), a subcommittee member. TSCA has none of these requirements. The House subcommittee hearing follows the Senate introduction of a bipartisan TSCA reform bill (S. 1009) that has attracted widespread support (C&EN, May 27, page 8).

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.