Fail On Plastic Guns | Chemical & Engineering News
  • Dec. 2, 2013, page 32: An article about wrinkle-free cotton incorrectly showed the structure of cellulose chains cross-linked by DMDHEU (red). The corrected structure is shown.

    Dec. 9, 2013, page 32: “Analyzing Cannabis” incorrectly stated that Iron Labs is the only marijuana testing laboratory in Michigan. There are multiple marijuana testing labs in that state.

Volume 92 Issue 1 | pp. 5-6 | Letters
Issue Date: January 6, 2014

Fail On Plastic Guns

Department: Letters

I wish C&EN would discuss chemistry and not push political views. The article “The Desktop Arms Plant” reports on an upcoming technology that has a lot of uses (C&EN, Sept. 30, 2013, page 11). Why not report on how it can be used to make experimental robotic parts or machine prototype parts? Instead, the article presents an alarmist slant about hobbyists attempting to make a weapon.

Far better weapons are readily available in gun stores in all states. For those with criminal intent, they can readily purchase weapons on the black market, through the same channels that distribute illegal drugs. What criminal would trust his life to a plastic gun that might explode and would only shoot seven times at half power?

You failed to note that the Second Amendment is about self-defense for home, family, and community. Being able to make firearms from a variety of materials has always been a possibility for the mechanically inclined. This right is guaranteed by the Second Amendment, which underpins all of the other rights. You might as well discuss how 200 million people were killed in the 20th century by their own governments, mostly after being disarmed by gun prohibition laws.

Tore Fossum
Huntsville, Texas

 
Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
Comments
Bob Buntrock (February 4, 2014 8:08 AM)
Although 3D printing of guns was the headliner (and cover article) other, more constructive uses of 3D printing were noted as well as concerns by many in the field for the proliferation and safety aspects of homemade guns. It would seem that instead of C&EN politicizing the situation that you and other gun proponents are making it political. You cite no mention of the 2nd Amendment but in doing so you politicize. Do you recommend making plastic guns for self and home defense giving their one shot only and other safety concerns? Apparently you're among those, probably an NRA member, who comb the press for anything to do with guns and instead of technical concerns you write mostly on 2nd Amendment issues. That's politicization.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment