ADVERTISEMENT
2 /3 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Safety

Chemical Industry Fights Railway Policy In Court

Transportation: Lawsuit challenges Canadian Pacific Railway's move to limit toxic rail shipments

by Glenn Hess
April 21, 2014 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 92, ISSUE 16

The chemical industry is asking a U.S. district court to stop Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) from continuing its new policy that restricts railcar shipments of chlorine, anhydrous ammonia, and other extremely hazardous chemicals.

Last month, CP announced that as of April 14, it would no longer transport toxic inhalation hazard materials—gases or liquids that are known to pose a danger to humans in the event of a release—in an older type of tank car that is prone to rupture in accidents. Those cars, built before 1989, do not contain steel that has been “normalized,” a heat-treating process that makes steel less brittle at lower temperatures and less susceptible to fractures.

“CP believes there is a shared responsibility to haul these commodities throughout North America in the safest possible manner,” the company says.

But in a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, several chemical industry trade groups call CP’s move “arbitrary and illegal.”

“It is up to the Department of Transportation (DOT)—not the railroads—to specify the appropriate rail package for commodities of a particular hazard,” says Frank Reiner, president of the Chlorine Institute, one of the groups involved in the litigation.

CP’s embargo affects about 21% of the 5,300 cars in the chlorine tanker fleet. “All cars currently in use meet existing DOT safety requirements,” Reiner notes. “CP’s action, in effect, unilaterally bans otherwise safe and legal rail shipments.”

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Comments
James R. Noyce (April 22, 2014 7:26 PM)
I applaud the CP Railway decision, and think the U.S. DOT should require upgraded or new tank cars that meet a higher safety standard for ALL hazardous materials shipments including, but not limited to, chlorine, anhydrous ammonia, and the more flammable crude oils.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment