ADVERTISEMENT
2 /3 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Environment

White House To Present Plan For Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Coal-Fired Power Plants

Emissions: Proposal to address climate change will be politically contentious

by Jeff Johnson
May 30, 2014 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 92, ISSUE 22

President Barack Obama on June 2 will present his scheme for lowering carbon dioxide emissions from the nation’s coal-fired power plants. Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency proposal under the Clean Air Act is part of his plan to address climate change, which he announced a year ago.

The proposal is critical to greenhouse gas reduction because coal-fired power plants are responsible for 40% of U.S. CO2 emissions. Coal serves as the primary source of U.S. electricity, generating a 39% share. However, coal’s contribution to electricity supply is in decline, dropping from a recent high of 50% because of the growing use of natural gas and renewable energy.

The proposal is anticipated to rely on energy efficiency, with incentives for utilities and consumers. It is likely to encourage carbon cap-and-trade programs similar to those operating in the Northeast and California. The proposal is expected to influence ongoing international negotiations on a new global climate-change treaty.

Obama has said the plan will be made final within a year. Litigation against it is almost guaranteed.

In the weeks before the announcement, battle lines were being drawn. For instance, the U.S. Chamber of ­Commerce, a business group, estimated the proposal would cost the nation $50 billion per year through 2030. The World Resources Institute, an environmental think tank, claimed the U.S. can easily reduce CO2 through existing policies. Some in Congress threatened to derail or stall the proposal.

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Comments
William Rubin (June 7, 2014 12:11 AM)
If one could prove that CO2 emissions actually significantly produce a deleterious effect on the climate, this would be laudable. Unfortunately, this is just another example of the Obama administration's attempt to damage corporations via mandatory, expensive regulations, eventually passing these monetary burden to consumers.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment