Advertisement

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Analytical Chemistry

Eric Betzig, Stefan Hell, And W. E. Moerner Win 2014 Nobel Prize In Chemistry

Awards: Superresolution fluorescence microscopy has made it possible to capture nanoscale images of cells

by Celia Henry Arnaud
October 9, 2014 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 92, Issue 41

Betzig
[+]Enlarge
Credit:
Matt Stanley/HHMI
Photo of Eric Betzig, winner of 2014 Nobel prize in chemistry.
Credit:
Matt Stanley/HHMI

The 2014 Nobel Prize in Chemistry honors three individuals for the development of superresolution fluorescence microscopy, which has made it possible to obtain optical images at the nanometer scale—well below the diffraction limit.

Hell
[+]Enlarge
Credit: Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Photo of Stephan Hell, winner of the 2014 Nobel prize in chemistry.
Credit: Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Moerner
[+]Enlarge
Credit:
L.A. Cicero
Photo of W.E. Moerner of Stanford, who shares the 2014 Nobel prize in chemistry.
Credit:
L.A. Cicero

Eric Betzig, 51, of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Janelia Farm campus in Ashburn, Va.; Stefan W. Hell, 51, of the Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, in Göttingen, Germany, and the German Cancer Research Center, in Heidelberg; and William E. (W. E.) Moerner, 61, of Stanford University will share the $1.1 million prize.

Moerner was the first person to detect a single fluorescent molecule, which he achieved while working at IBM’s Almaden Research Center in San Jose, ­Calif. Before that, researchers could only detect many molecules ­simultaneously.

[+]Enlarge
Credit: G. Donnert & S. W. Hell/Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
The filament structures within a nerve cell are clearly resolved in a STED microscopy image (circular inset) but blurry in a conventional light microscope image.
The filament structures within a nerve cell are clearly resolved in a STED micrscopy image (circular inset) but blurry in a conventional light microscope image.
Credit: G. Donnert & S. W. Hell/Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
The filament structures within a nerve cell are clearly resolved in a STED microscopy image (circular inset) but blurry in a conventional light microscope image.

Moerner later discovered, while working at the University of California, San Diego, that one variant of green fluorescent protein could be turned on and off on command. The protein would fluoresce when excited with 488-nm light, but once it faded the protein wouldn’t turn back on. But Moerner discovered that exposure to 405-nm light reactivated the protein. It could again be excited with 488-nm light.

Such photoswitchable fluorescent proteins form the basis of photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM), which Betzig coinvented with Harald Hess in 2006. They built the original instrument in Hess’s living room.

In PALM, photoactivatable fluorescent proteins are toggled on and off a few at a time. The method requires that the activated proteins be far enough apart that their locations can be precisely determined. An image can be built by repeating the cycle many times and superimposing the images. Similar methods were also developed in 2006 by Xiaowei Zhuang of Harvard University (stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy, or STORM) and by Samuel T. Hess of the University of Maine (fluorescence PALM, or fPALM).

The method developed by Hell—stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy—works differently. In that method, one laser beam stimulates fluorescence in labeled biomolecules. A second overlapping doughnut-shaped laser beam turns off that fluorescence in all but a nanometer-sized volume. By scanning across a sample, it is possible to build an image with nanometer-scale resolution.

“I’m glad not to be in the shoes of the Nobel Prize committee which had to make the decision who not to include as an award winner,” says Joerg Bewersdorf, a superresolution microscopy expert at Yale University. “The field has benefited tremendously by contributions of quite a few pioneers over the last two decades.”

These original superresolution methods improved lateral resolution, but they did little to improve depth resolution. Since the introduction of PALM, STORM, STED, and fPALM, the inventors and others have further developed them to acquire three-dimensional images.

The awarding of the prize for superresolution imaging “reflects the amazing impact this technology is having throughout biology,” says Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, a cell biologist at the National Institutes of Health who has collaborated with Betzig. These techniques “are revolutionizing our concepts of some of the most fundamental components of living cells, which up until now were hidden because of our inability to see below the resolution limit of light.”

“I see this as a confluence of areas of science,” American Chemical Society President Thomas J. Barton says. “There’s no question it’s chemistry. But we see a lot of sciences playing a role in the whole picture. I think that’s a very healthy thing.”

Photo of Eric Betzig and Harald Hess’s original photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) instrument in Hess’ living room.
Credit: HHMI
Betzig and Harald Hess built their original instrument in Hess’s living room.

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

0 /1 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.