If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.



Building A Safer Button Battery

Pressure-sensitive coating stops current flow from button batteries when outside of devices

by Celia Henry Arnaud
November 17, 2014 | A version of this story appeared in Volume 92, Issue 46

Tissue showing damage from conventional button battery (left) and no damage from coated button battery.
Credit: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
Conventional 11.6-mm, 1.5-V button batteries cause damage to a pig esophagus (left). The same size battery featuring a pressure-sensitive coating does no damage (right).

A new battery coating could help prevent burns from ingestion of so-called button batteries, the small disc batteries used to power such devices as watches.

Last year, more than 3,300 people ingested button batteries, including more than 2,200 children under the age of six, according to the National Poison Data System. Outcomes ranged from no health effects to death.

Button batteries cause injury by releasing a current that breaks down water in tissue, generating hydroxide ions that chemically burn the tissue. Extensive tissue damage can occur if the battery gets stuck in the esophagus.

“The battery that is implicated in the most serious cases is the 20-mm-diameter, 3-V lithium cell,” says Toby L. Litovitz, executive and medical director of the National Capital Poison Center, who is an expert on battery injuries.

A new coating could ward off such damage by stopping batteries from releasing current when they aren’t in devices. To make the coating, Robert S. Langer of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jeffrey M. Karp of Harvard Medical School, and coworkers used an off-the-shelf material called a quantum tunneling composite (QTC), which consists of conductive metal microparticles suspended in an insulating silicone matrix (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418423111).

Current flows through the QTC only when sufficient pressure from the battery compartment is applied to push the microparticles close enough for charge to jump between them.

The team attached a QTC-coated disc to the anode of 11.6-mm, 1.5-V button batteries. They covered the rest of the anode and the gasket between the anode and cathode with a layer of waterproof polymer. The resulting coated batteries can power a laser pointer as effectively as conventional batteries.

In animal studies, the QTC-coated battery caused no tissue damage.

Litovitz commends the researchers but has reservations. “They are correct that the best solution to this problem is a safer battery,” she says. But she points to several obstacles to implementing the technology, including the type of battery the MIT researchers used. “While we can hope that the data gathered from a 1.5-V cell will extrapolate to a 3-V cell, that remains to be demonstrated,” she says. In addition, success depends on there being a significant difference between the pressure required to hold a battery in place and the pressure experienced in the esophagus. With the larger coin batteries, the pressure difference may not be as great as the researchers have estimated for the smaller batteries, she says.

Nevertheless, Langer and Karp are optimistic. They are looking for partners to produce QTC-coated batteries. “We don’t think cost will be an issue. We think it will add maybe pennies, definitely not dollars, to the system,” Karp says.



This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.