Reforms Need To Overhaul Postdoctoral Education Experience, National Research Council Says | December 15, 2014 Issue - Vol. 92 Issue 50 | Chemical & Engineering News
Volume 92 Issue 50 | p. 7 | News of The Week
Issue Date: December 15, 2014

Reforms Need To Overhaul Postdoctoral Education Experience, National Research Council Says

Report recommends five-year limit on work and a minimum salary of $50,000
Department: Government & Policy
Keywords: postdoctoral scientists, National Research Council, postdocs

Significant changes are needed to improve the mentoring of postdoctoral scientists and prevent abuse of a system that is often focused on producing results rather than training scientists, says a National Research Council (NRC) report released last week.

“Most institutions don’t have any idea of how many postdocs they have, which suggests that postdocs are still invisible people,” says Gregory A. Petsko, chair of the committee that wrote the report and a professor at Weill Cornell Medical College.

The postdoctoral system has well-known problems—this is the fourth report on postdocs from NRC—but only a few reforms have taken hold. Meanwhile, the number of postdocs continues to grow.

The new report recommends major changes, including a five-year limit on total postdoctoral work and a minimum $50,000 salary with benefits to better reflect postdocs’ education and experience.

The National Postdoctoral Association supports both steps, Executive Director Belinda Lee Huang says. “We believe strongly that it should be a temporary training.”

Institutions and individual investigators need to improve mentoring and career development, starting in graduate school, the report says. That will ensure postdocs are getting advanced research training for a career, rather than filling the role of a technician or staff scientist. It will also help budding researchers realize that a postdoc is not required for many careers and should not be a default step for becoming a scientist.

The report lays out tasks for the federal government, research institutions, lab heads, professional societies, and postdocs, who need to be stronger advocates for themselves, Petsko says.

 
Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
Comments
John T (December 16, 2014 12:47 PM)
A much needed follow including serious reforms to how academia deals with postdocs. These recommendations are invaluable and must be implemented. Especially the 50K minimum salaray. Paying NIH minimums is slave wages for highly skilled individuals with this many years education and who form the backbone of the technological advantages society benefits from.
Jerry Jin (December 18, 2014 8:51 AM)
Can't agree more. Admit it or not, the majority of PIs are exploiting postdocs as cheap labors.
Chris Kuckleburg (December 26, 2014 5:38 PM)
A five-year cap on post-docs, and a four-year rule on PhDs. We don't need PhDs spending 5, 6 or 7 years of study for any field. You can't argue that there is "more to learn" today. Medical school and Law school are still four and three years; that hasn't changed in decades. If you want to keep some longer, offer them a job (not a postdoc).

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment