ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
“When Chemicals Became Weapons of War” claims that “hundreds of Syrian civilians [were] killed by their military’s use of sarin” (C&EN, Feb. 23, page 21). Not to put too fine a point on it, but the attribution of responsibility for this atrocity has been far from unanimous. The French government, former colonial ruler of Syria, led the charge in accusing the Syrian government of having launched the attack.
An article on the website truth-out.org, on April 29, 2014, summarizes evidence that casts doubt on this rush to judgment. The author writes that “the debate over the Aug. 21 attacks has focused primarily on a series of assertions about ‘smoking guns’ that allegedly proved Syrian government guilt.” The article proceeds to quote evidence that the areas within a radius of 2 km from the impact sites were controlled by rebels.
Credible alternatives to C&EN’s version of events in Syria do exist.
Karl H. Hiller
Spring Valley, N.Y.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter