Issue Date: December 7, 2015
Cancer Drugs Were Most Sought After In 2015
- Another Big Merger For Pfizer
- 2015 Saw Bets Placed On CRISPR/Cas9
- 2015 Was Mostly Stable For Drug Firms
- 2015 Was A Bountiful Year For New Drugs
- Leading Drugs Under Fire In 2015
- Debate Over The Cost Of Drugs
- Cancer Drugs Were Most Sought After In 2015
- Biotech Blossomed On The Charles In 2015
- 2015 Marked Record Year For Biotech Investment
- Biotechs See Boom And Bust In 2015
Excitement over immuno-oncology treatments reached manic levels in 2015. As more data emerged to support the notion that harnessing the immune system is an effective way to battle cancer, companies jockeyed for assets to add to their portfolios. Each month seemed to bring another sizable deal, company launch, or notable clinical development.
One of the year’s most important developments came in May during the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s annual meeting. Amid a crowded auditorium in Chicago, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center oncologist Jedd Wolchok showed that combining Bristol-Myers Squibb’s CTLA4 inhibitor Yervoy and its PD-1 inhibitor Opdivo was more effective in treating metastatic melanoma than using either therapy alone.
That result underscores a key theme in cancer immunotherapy, says Paul D. Rennert, head of the consulting firm SugarCone Biotech. The large trial provided the first substantial evidence that, as researchers suspected, cancer immunotherapies work best with partners.
And the best partners will be “checkpoint inhibitors,” antibodies that take the brakes off the immune system. “If there’s going to be combinations, the PD-1 inhibitors will be the backbone of the combination—it’ll be a PD-1 inhibitor plus something else,” says Colin White, an analyst at Datamonitor Healthcare. “What’s not well understood at this time is what that ‘something else’ will be.”
To that end, companies spent the year broadening their portfolios to ensure they had access to a backbone therapy plus complementary molecules.
Sanofi, for example, committed $1.8 billion to an immuno-oncology pact with Regeneron through which it gained both a PD-1 inhibitor and antibodies against several other immune checkpoint targets. Celgene shelled out $450 million to participate in development of AstraZeneca’s PD-L1 inhibitor MEDI4736.
Other prominent deals include Bristol-Myers Squibb’s $1.25 billion buyout of Flexus Biosciences, a biotech firm with small molecules that block IDO, an enzyme that helps cancer cells evade immune surveillance.
But even as companies compete for the best agents to combine, researchers acknowledge a steep learning curve in figuring out how to pair them safely. The Yervoy-Opdivo combination carried side effects that were severe enough for more than one-third of patients in that arm of the trial to discontinue treatment.
And Yervoy and Opdivo are expensive. Although the list price of $256,000 per year for the combination therapy, which the Food & Drug Administration approved in October, is lower than the sum of the individual drugs, the question of how much immunotherapies should cost became more acute this year.
Cost became a flash point for another set of attention-grabbing immuno-oncology agents: cellular therapies. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapies, made by reengineering a patient’s own T cells to seek and destroy cancer cells, have elicited remarkable responses in some types of blood cancers and prompted another batch of partnerships.
But because they are individualized, CARTs, if approved, are expected to be extremely expensive. Companies, insurers, and other stakeholders are already contemplating new mechanisms to pay for them.
- Chemical & Engineering News
- ISSN 0009-2347
- Copyright © American Chemical Society