ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Your article about finding the uranium cube that suggests a solution to Werner Heisenberg’s nuclear power experiments (C&EN, Oct. 5, 2015, page 30) struck me strongly because I had just attended a production of Michael Frayn’s play “Copenhagen.”
The play imaginatively re-creates a real meeting between Heisenberg and Niels Bohr in 1941. It delves into the question of just how Heisenberg managed the Nazi atomic energy program—and whether he was really trying to achieve a bomb or not. It uses Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle as a metaphor for the lack of answers to those questions. I highly recommend the play to anyone interested in the history of that period!
Your article strongly suggests that Heisenberg’s postwar claim that he was trying to do science rather than bomb-making may have been more correct than not—within the limits of uncertainty, of course.
James N. Cawse
Pittsfield, Mass.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on Twitter