Cement could be a helpful carbon sink | November 22, 2016 Issue - Vol. 94 Issue 47 | Chemical & Engineering News
Volume 94 Issue 47 | p. 8 | News of The Week
Issue Date: November 28, 2016 | Web Date: November 22, 2016

Cement could be a helpful carbon sink

Model suggests cement reacting with CO₂ can offset part of the emissions from its production
Department: Science & Technology
News Channels: Environmental SCENE
Keywords: climate change, cement, carbon dioxide, carbonation, calcination, carbon capture
[+]Enlarge
Cement plants are major emitters of carbon dioxide.
Credit: Shutterstock
Photograph of a cement plant.
 
Cement plants are major emitters of carbon dioxide.
Credit: Shutterstock

Making cement requires a lot of heat and releases large amounts of carbon dioxide. The heat helps transform limestone (calcium carbonate) into clinker, which is largely calcium oxide. This process, called calcination, is responsible for about 5% of global human-based CO2 emissions.

But the cement itself may help offset some of those climate-changing emissions, according to a new study. A team of researchers estimate that 43% of the CO2 released by cement calcination between 1930 and 2013 was reabsorbed by the cement created during that period (Nat. Geosci. 2016, DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2840).

Removing CO2 from the atmosphere, not just emitting less of it, is a significant part of what many climate scientists think we must do to avoid major consequences from climate change. “It’s not a small amount of CO2 that needs to be removed from the atmosphere,” says Phil Renforth, who studies carbon sequestration at Cardiff University. “But what is interesting about this study is that part of that requirement of removing CO2 from the atmosphere may already be happening by the unintended carbonation of cement. The challenge is designing and accounting for this in the life cycle of cement.”

Carbonation is the process by which cement takes up CO2: Hydrated minerals in cement react with CO2 in the air to form carbonates. Engineers have long known about this process because it can affect the stability of cement. But a team led by Zhu Liu of the Resnick Sustainability Institute at Caltech wanted to quantify the scale of cement carbonation.

The researchers collected data from 1930 to 2013 on global cement production, the types of products made with that cement, and the lifetimes and fates of those products. They then used a computer model to estimate the carbonation rates for those different cement products based on properties of the cement that they measured experimentally or that had been reported in the literature.

Their model suggests that cement has sequestered about 4.5 gigatons of carbon since 1930. And the annual sequestration rate has been increasing overtime, reaching 0.25 gigatons of carbon in 2013. The 2013 carbonation rate is equivalent to 22.7% of the average annual carbon uptake of global forests and about 2.5% of global human-based carbon emissions in 2013.

According to the model, China has become a hotspot for carbonation because of the nation’s building boom. Since 1994, cement in China has sequestered more CO2 than the cement from all other parts of the world combined. Before then, the majority of the carbonation was in the U.S. and Europe.

Previous studies on carbon sinks have focused on natural reservoirs, Liu says. The important message of this work is that “cement—a human system—can also be seen as a carbon sink,” he says.

But Thomas Gasser, who works on climate models at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, stresses that cement isn’t exactly a conventional carbon sink because making the material releases CO2. The best way to summarize the new study, he says, “is to say that cement production actually has a lower impact on climate than previously thought, since it emits less CO2 in total.”

The carbonation estimates, Cardiff’s Renforth says, suggest that cement production hypothetically could become a net negative CO2-emission process if manufacturers started using carbon sequestration technology at their plants to make cement production more carbon-neutral. However, he says, “It would take a hell of a lot of work to get kilns carbon-neutral.”

 
Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
Comments
Mark Williams (Mon Nov 28 13:05:30 EST 2016)
"researchers estimate that 43% of the CO2 released by cement calcination between 1930 and 2013 was reabsorbed by the cement created during that period"
This seems highly unlikely. Concrete is only carbonated to a depth of about a cm in 100 years, so only a tiny fraction of the concrete poured is ever involved in carbonation. Perhaps the researchers slipped a decimal. Did they mean 4.3%?

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment