ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Offices within the Department of Defense have yet to agree on what makes a rare-earth element critical for national security, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) says in a report released this month. What’s more, DOD does not have a department-wide strategy for assessing which rare earths are critical. According to the report, three offices within the department have at various times identified 15 of the 17 rare earths as critical over the past five years. “DOD’s current approach to identifying and mitigating risks associated with rare earths is fragmented. With different interpretations of which rare earths are critical, establishing priorities to analyze supply risk becomes difficult,” says the report by GAO, the investigative arm of Congress. Rare earths, which include the lanthanide series plus scandium and yttrium, are used in advanced lasers, magnets, and other weapon-related applications by the military. DOD agreed with GAO’s recommendation to identify which rare earths are critical and work toward a department-wide strategy for securing its rare-earth supply chain.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X