EPA scraps methane reporting for oil and gas industries | March 8, 2017 Issue - Vol. 95 Issue 11 | Chemical & Engineering News
Volume 95 Issue 11 | p. 16 | News of The Week
Issue Date: March 13, 2017 | Web Date: March 8, 2017

EPA scraps methane reporting for oil and gas industries

Pruitt kills data collection at request of several states
By Jeff Johnson, special to C&EN
Department: Government & Policy
News Channels: Environmental SCENE
Keywords: methane, oil and natural gas, climate change, EPA
[+]Enlarge
The Trump EPA nixed requirements for existing oil and gas operations to report their methane emissions.
Credit: Arina P Habich/Shutterstock
Photo shows oil pump jacks in Colorado with Rocky Mountains in the distance.
 
The Trump EPA nixed requirements for existing oil and gas operations to report their methane emissions.
Credit: Arina P Habich/Shutterstock

The Trump Administration has withdrawn an EPA request that oil and natural gas companies provide information on their methane emission from field operations.

The Obama Administration had sent the data request to some 15,000 oil and gas companies late last year. It asked for basic information on the numbers and types of equipment used at onshore drilling and production facilities as well as more detailed information on methane emissions sources and control devices.

Earlier in 2016, EPA issued methane control regulations for new oil and gas facilities, but did not address existing facilities. The data collection rule was an attempt by the Obama EPA to learn more about oil and gas operations in preparation for emissions regulations at operating facilities.

Oil and gas operations are the largest industrial source of methane, a greenhouse gas 25 times more potent that carbon dioxide, according to EPA.

The U.S. is experiencing an oil and gas bonanza with some million wells in operation. However, in the rush to exploit the resource much is unclear—even the exact number of wells is uncertain. Confusion also surrounds the quantity of methane emissions. The now-canceled reporting was intended to help resolve this uncertainty.

“There is a lack of transparency in oil and gas operations,” notes Mark Brownstein, vice president of climate and energy at the Environmental Defense Fund, an activist group. “We really don’t know what is out there. You can’t manage what you are not measuring. The irony is industry called for this information before EPA proposes to regulate existing oil and gas facilities.”

“It is a missed opportunity,” says Rob Jackson, a Stanford University earth scientist. Some companies are already collecting—and often sharing—information on their methane emissions, he adds.

Industry applauds the withdrawal. Howard Feldman, the American Petroleum Institute’s director of regulatory affairs, calls EPA’s announcement a “positive step in reducing significant oil industry uncertainties and burdens.”

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt says he received a request the day before the March 2 withdrawal from nine state attorneys general and the governors of Mississippi and Kentucky to kill the reporting request. EPA, he said, takes such concerns “seriously and is committed to strengthening its partnership with the states.”

 
Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
Comments
Chad Brick (Thu Mar 09 00:16:58 EST 2017)
Time to sue, then. Oil and gas extractors do not have the right to put one molecule of anything into the commons or third party's properties without just compensation.

Hezron (Sun Mar 12 18:13:02 EDT 2017)
It now seems the only way to beat the oil industry by investing more on the green technology, that is, before things get out of hand. It will soon be, though.
Corky (Mon Mar 13 18:55:45 EDT 2017)
9 AGs and 2 Governors? What about the other 41 AGs and 48 governors? Wonder if he takes them seriously too? Not to mention the public which is where the real harm is done.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment