Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.



Scientific groups disappointed in Trump's move on climate

U.S. president pledges to exit Paris Agreement

by Cheryl Hogue
June 1, 2017 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 95, ISSUE 23

Credit: AP
Trump made his announcement in the White House Rose Garden.
Credit: AP
Trump made his announcement in the White House Rose Garden.

Leaders from the chemical and scientific enterprises expressed disappointment that President Donald J. Trump announced he will withdraw the U.S. from a landmark climate change deal.

When countries completed the Paris Agreement on climate change in December 2015, chemists and other scientists were viewed as key actors in implementing it.

“Climate change represents a real and current threat to our economy, health, and welfare,” Thomas Connelly, CEO of the American Chemical Society, which said it was disappointed with the president’s plan. “America should continue to take the lead in addressing global greenhouse gas emissions and become a leader in sustainable energy production and technology,” Connelly adds. ACS publishes C&EN.

Moderna Therapeutics CEO Stephane Bancel said in a tweet he also was disappointed in Trump’s decision to leave the Paris deal. He added, “We all need to continue to do the right thing.”

Still, Trump’s move doesn’t seem likely to change the U.S. chemical industry’s current direction. “Chemical manufacturers will continue to meet global demand for materials and technologies that improve energy efficiency and reduce emissions,” the industry group American Chemistry Council said.

Alden Meyer of the Union of Concerned Scientists called Trump’s move “reprehensible.” However, he added, “The clean energy revolution is well underway and can’t be halted by President Trump’s ill-informed choice.” And Rush Holt, CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science “There is much the U.S. can do to address the risks that climate change poses to human health and safety, but disregarding scientific evidence puts our communities at risk.”

In his announcement, Trump said the 2015 Paris Agreement was less about climate change and more about other countries gaining an economic advantage over the U.S. “and laughing at us.” A senior White House official who spoke to reporters on condition that he not be named said the president was concerned about the impact of the pact on domestic manufacturing, including the chemicals sector.

Yet in a tweet just hours before Trump’s announcement, Dow Chemical urged the president to keep the U.S. in the climate deal. “You won the election with a manufacturing jobs agenda. If you want to create jobs in this sector, support the #ParisAgreement.”

The president said the U.S. will begin negotiations anew on a climate deal and invited Democrats, who he called obstructionists, to join in the work. “We’ll see if we can make a deal that’s fair,” one that protects the environment, U.S. companies, the American people, and the nation’s economy, Trump said.

Under the Paris Agreement, all U.N. countries except Nicaragua—which said the deal wasn’t tough enough—and conflict-plagued Syria pledged to limit their greenhouse gas emissions. The accord calls for countries to revisit their individual pledges every five years, with the hope that nations will adopt stricter limits as the price of cleaner energy technology drops.

The goal of the Paris accord is to keep global average temperatures to “well below” a 2 °C rise above preindustrial levels by 2100. The pledges in the agreement, however, would limit this expected temperature increase to 3 °C by century’s end.

Trump’s move is the latest in a series of actions to dismantle policies put in place by former president Barack Obama to address climate change, which Trump criticized during last year’s election campaign. Since taking office, Trump has issued directives to increase U.S. extraction of fossil fuels and proposed eliminating most federal research related to climate change, including advanced energy technology development and satellite observations.

He also ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to review, with an eye on overturning, Obama’s cornerstone action for meeting the U.S. commitments under the Paris deal, the Clean Power Plan. That regulation requires coal-fired power plants to reduce their emissions of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas emitted by human activity.

The U.S. won’t officially be able to get out of the Paris Agreement until November 2020. That’s because accord sets out a three-year process for withdrawal. But no country can give official notice of its intent to exit the pact until Nov. 4, 2017, exactly a year after the accord entered into force.



This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Bobby (June 4, 2017 12:09 AM)
It seems the aim is quite simply to have people focus on China as the world's top greenhouse gas producer (since 2015), but without all the necessary facts, the regime behind Mr Trump to stop participation in the Paris climate accords helps the world's most powerful democracy skirt the responsibility of helping fix over 100 years of unabated greenhouse gas emissions. BUT the historic truth is that the USA (plus Europe) are still far ahead in front of China with total amounts of greenhouse gas production and the peril of which still lingering menacingly in our atmosphere: since the beginning of the industrial revolution in the mid-late 19th century to present-day, the USA alone has put 350,000 million-tonnes of greenhouse gas pollutants into our air, while China in this same timeframe until now has put about 150,000 million-tonnes of the same greenhouse gas pollutants; it'll take China DECADES from now just to catch up to the USA alone! so I'm spewing this out in hopes to have some very brainwashed Americans (such an irony) to please think open-mindedly before jumping on the "hate China" bandwagon driven by the Judeo-Christian machismo regime under Mr Trump, and consider all the people in the third world still needing to advance and develop progressively without the benefits cheap dirty fossil fuels that helped fuel the USA, Japan, China, EU... to top-developed economies.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment