Organometallic flow reaction reaches industrial scale | March 12, 2018 Issue - Vol. 96 Issue 11 | Chemical & Engineering News
Volume 96 Issue 11 | p. 10 | News of The Week
Issue Date: March 12, 2018 | Web Date: March 7, 2018

Organometallic flow reaction reaches industrial scale

Chemists solve solubility problems to produce 100 kg of product
Department: Science & Technology
News Channels: Organic SCENE
Keywords: Process Chemistry, organometallic chemistry, flow chemistry, verubecestat
Merck's reaction, now optimized at pilot plant scale, builds a crucial chiral center on route to a drug candidate.
Reaction scheme depicting organometallic flow chemistry reaction at pilot plant scale.
Merck's reaction, now optimized at pilot plant scale, builds a crucial chiral center on route to a drug candidate.

By ferreting out weak points in their production process, Merck chemists have optimized an organometallic flow chemistry reaction at scales in excess of 100 kg (Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018, DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.7b00385). Lessons from this work could help others seeking to scale up reactions of their own, the authors say.

The reaction involves adding an organolithium anion to a source of a nitrogen-containing carbon stereocenter. This chemistry builds a crucial chiral center in verubecestat, a compound Merck has evaluated in Phase III clinical trials for treating Alzheimer’s disease. In prior work, David A. Thaisrivongs, John R. Naber, and colleagues decided to run the reaction in flow to increase their yield. Keeping the process flowing kept the product from consuming unreacted starting material.

They had perfected the flow reaction at an approximately 1-kg scale, but going to a pilot plant, and increasing the scale to hundreds of kilograms, introduced unforeseen problems.

A flow reaction works best with homogenous solutions. With longer flow reaction times and larger scales, however, slurries and aggregates started to rear their ugly heads. The researchers came up with fixes for each problem. To eliminate insoluble deposits when generating the organolithium anion, the chemists formed it in batch mode, and then flowed it into the reactor. To prevent starting material from caking on the reaction vessel wall, the team tweaked the order of addition, putting solvent into the system first. Just when they’d had those problems licked, the organolithium anion, which had always been soluble once it was generated, started looking more like a slushy than a solution. The chemists solubilized the anion by adding N,N’-dimethylpropylene urea (DMPU).

“We grew to appreciate that when designing a flow process, it is important to establish robustness, not just for a few minutes in the lab, but over many hours, and at commercial scale,” Thaisrivongs says.

With additional measures to precisely control the temperature of the reaction, the Merck team was able to run the reaction for over three hours at the plant, producing more than 100 kg of product. The future use of this optimized reaction isn’t clear. Investigators last month withdrew verubecestat from a Phase III trial for the second time.

The lessons for flow chemistry, however, still stand. “Handling solids in flow is still a limitation when converting from batch to continuous processes,” says Martin D. Johnson, who works on flow chemistry for Eli Lilly & Co. He calls the work “a notable flow chemistry advance.”

“Flow is not without challenges—sometimes unique ones—when scaling up,” and this group has provided solutions, adds Aaron Beeler, a Boston University chemist and cofounder of the continuous flow technology firm Snapdragon Chemistry.

This article has been translated into Spanish by and can be found here.

Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © American Chemical Society
Sankar Raghavan (March 8, 2018 1:15 PM)
I understand from your statement "Keeping the process flowing kept the product from consuming unreacted starting material" that you're working with a series reaction. Am I correct? Was the flow reactor custom made for your process? It appears you have overcome many issues by modifying your chemistry. Did you look at parameters such as flow velocity to induce turbulence, residence time and temperature to overcome the issues you encountered?
Srinivas (March 10, 2018 8:03 PM)
This innovative approach to solving solubility issues using chemistry tweaks is really the most effective one.Engineering based approaches are not as effective as this strategy.Solids generation in situ creates obstacles for deploying reactors with complicated internals and this approach exemplifies what should be done. Kudos to this team.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment