ERROR 1
ERROR 1
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
ERROR 2
Password and Confirm password must match.
If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)
ERROR 2
ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.
Credit: C&EN/Shutterstock
Like many events in 2020, the American Chemical Society salary survey was delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Normally conducted in the spring, the survey collected data in June and July of last year. The data shown here reflect the median annual salaries for 4,565 ACS members under age 70 who work as full-time employees in the US. (ACS publishes C&EN.)
The most notable change from the 2019 survey is the drop in unemployment rate. The salary survey shows an unemployment rate of 1.5% for ACS members, who were asked to report their status as of March 1, 2020. That’s down more than a point from the 2019 rate and is the lowest rate in the past 20 years. Unemployment in some regions dropped to below 1%.
Why the big drop? C&EN asked ACS its thoughts about the change and what might be causing it.
To start, there’s the date: March 1 was before most people would have felt the economic effects of COVID-19. “I would point to the rise in the economy and how our economy’s been doing in general prior to the pandemic,” says Eric Bruton, a chemist at Boeing and chair of the ACS Committee on Economic and Professional Affairs (CEPA), which oversees the salary survey. He points in particular to growth in several chemical-related industries during late 2019 and early 2020. “Overall, it’s a nice positive.”
Steven Meyers, who oversees the salary survey as ACS’s senior director of member programming, says the low employment rate “is emblematic of a trend that we’ve been seeing since the end of the last recession” in 2008–9, reflecting more than 10 years of economic growth.
The drop in unemployment in the ACS survey data isn’t reflected in the US unemployment rate in March for people with at least a bachelor’s degree, which was up slightly from 2.0% in March 2019 to 2.5% in March 2020, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. ACS often uses this number to compare trends for ACS members with the larger economy.
But Meyers points out that the ACS salary survey “is not of the entire US economy. It’s not of global chemists. It’s not even of US chemists. It’s a measure of the membership.” The ACS survey unemployment rate doesn’t include students, members over 70, or international members, Meyers says. In addition, ACS members are more likely to have a PhD and work in academia than US bachelor’s degree recipients. Those groups tend to have better employment outcomes.
ACS calculated a margin of error of ±1.45 percentage points for the unemployment rate, which could put the real unemployment at almost 0 or up to 3%, Meyers says.
ACS expects to see ACS member unemployment increase in 2021 as a result of the pandemic. Bruton encourages unemployed ACS members to use services such as career counseling, webinars, and dues waivers for people experiencing hardship because of the pandemic.
Note for all data: Data are from 4,565 American Chemical Society members’ survey responses collected from June 1 to July 14, 2020, except when other years’ data are shown. Salaries reflect the median annual salaries on March 1 for full-time US employees who say their work specialty is chemistry, except for the comparison between chemists and chemical engineers, which includes data from full-time US employees who say their work specialty is chemical engineering. Numbers do not include students, members over 70, or international members.
Note: Current dollars are the value in the year the salary was reported. Data are missing for 2017 and 2018 because of changes to the survey. For more explanation see the 2019 salary report at cenm.ag/salarysurvey2019.
Note: Salaries were adjusted for inflation using 1985 as the base year. Data are missing for 2017 and 2018 because of changes to the survey. For more explanation see the 2019 salary report at cenm.ag/salarysurvey2019.
Note: Respondents could choose more than one race and could additionally denote their Hispanic/Latino identity in response to a separate question. Salaries for Native Americans and Pacific Islanders are not reported because of the small number of people who responded in those categories.
Note: Numbers reflect unemployment status as of March 1 in the indicated year.
Note: Numbers do not add to 100% because respondents could choose more than one race and could additionally denote their Hispanic/Latino identity in response to a separate question.
Join the conversation
Contact the reporter
Submit a Letter to the Editor for publication
Engage with us on X