Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.


Green Chemistry

Electrochemistry cuts CO₂ footprint of synthesizing ethylene oxide

Strategy adds to toolkit for greening the chemical industry

by Mark Peplow, special to C&EN
June 11, 2020 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 98, ISSUE 23


A new electrochemical process that makes ethylene oxide could help slash the carbon footprint of this important commodity chemical. The strategy is part of a burgeoning effort to green the chemical industry by developing alternative synthetic routes that run on renewable electricity.

The chemical industry makes about 20 million metric tons of ethylene oxide per year, which is used in plastics, detergents, and solvents. It is produced by uniting oxygen and ethylene over a silver catalyst at temperatures of 200–300 °C and pressures up to 3 MPa, and the reaction generates almost as much of the greenhouse gas CO2 as ethylene oxide. More than half of this CO2 comes from the overoxidation of ethylene, with the remainder emitted by the combustion of fossil fuels used to power the process.

An electrochemical approach could curb these emissions, but it faces two big challenges. The first is that ethylene is poorly soluble in water, the preferred electrolyte solvent used inside the electrochemical cell. Low solubility hampers ethylene’s interaction with the cell’s anode and reduces the efficiency of the oxidation process. Boosting the power of the cell might improve the rate of ethylene oxide production, but it also creates a second challenge: it can overoxidize ethylene, generating unwanted CO2.

Edward H. Sargent’s team at the University of Toronto has now solved this conundrum by using chloride ions in the electrolyte as a vehicle to carry charge between the cell’s anode and ethylene to improve their interaction (Science 2020, DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz8459). “It’s a kind of redox mediator,” says Wan Ru Leow, the team member who led the research.


As current flows through the anode of the electrochemical cell it converts chloride ions into chlorine (Cl2), which forms hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and hydrochloric acid (HCl). Hypochlorous acid then reacts with ethylene to form ethylene chlorohydrin (also known as 1-chloro-2-hydroxyethane). Meanwhile, the cathode splits water to release hydroxide anions and hydrogen gas, which can be captured as an additional product. The team’s cell contains a membrane that separates its catalytic electrodes and prevents the solutions in each side of the cell from mixing.

After the anode and cathode reactions occur, the researchers remove the two solutions from the cell and combine them, allowing ethylene chlorohydrin to react with hydroxide and make ethylene oxide. Leow says that in an industrial process, these operations could potentially be carried out in a continuous flow system to further improve efficiency.

Overall, around 70% of the electrical current supplied to the cell goes into making the product—a reasonably high efficiency—and it produces no CO2 emissions. About 97% of the ethylene that reacts is turned into the desired epoxide, and in principle unreacted ethylene could be recirculated through the cell, the team says. The cell also converts propylene to propylene oxide with similar efficiency.

The electrosynthesis operates at a high current density up to 1 A/cm2, which determines how much product can be made by a given electrode. “It’s quite exceptional,” says Karthish Manthiram at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who is also developing electrochemical methods for making epoxides and was not involved in the new work. “They’ve gone right up to the sorts of current densities that are needed for commercial operation.”

The researchers also carried out a technoeconomic analysis of their process and concluded that under optimum conditions the process could produce ethylene oxide at a cost of roughly $1,500 per ton ($1650 per metric ton), matching the conventional process.

Last year, Sargent’s team unveiled an electrochemical method for reducing CO2 to ethylene (Nature 2019, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1782-2). By combining this earlier process with the new electrochemical system, the team also demonstrated it could convert CO2 all the way to ethylene oxide.

A pilot plant in Calgary running the team’s CO2-to-ethylene process can already produce 100 kg of ethylene per day, and Sargent says its might be possible to modify this equipment to test the new ethylene oxide process at a similar scale. He adds that there is growing commercial interest in these processes: “The global chemical industry is eager to see how it can decarbonize the sector.”



This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Prakash Bhate (June 18, 2020 2:07 AM)
Renewable electricity will have to be purely solar. Can't even be based on biomass because that will mean shifting the carbon dioxide footprint from the EO plant to the power plant. Also a base is required to convert chlorohydrin to EO as a second separate step after electrolysis; which takes us back to the 1914 BASF process. It used chlorine to produce HOCl. So the advantage here is that chlorine is consumed in situ and is not isolated, liquified and stored in tonners for later use. Whatever cost saving is achieved through the elimination of these steps will be neutralised by the cost of the base which is required in stoichiometric quantities. The BASF process used calcium hydroxide, significantly cheaper than soda ash; leave aside caustic soda. The calcium chloride so generated became a total waste. So, only pilot trials at reasonably significant scales will tell the real story. I will be reluctant to place my bets on this process.
Prakash Bhate (June 19, 2020 8:39 PM)
Correction: Delete lines 'Also a base ....... total waste'.

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment