ADVERTISEMENT
4 /5 FREE ARTICLES LEFT THIS MONTH Remaining
Chemistry matters. Join us to get the news you need.

If you have an ACS member number, please enter it here so we can link this account to your membership. (optional)

ACS values your privacy. By submitting your information, you are gaining access to C&EN and subscribing to our weekly newsletter. We use the information you provide to make your reading experience better, and we will never sell your data to third party members.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCES TO C&EN

Pollution

U.S. airports can stop requiring PFASs in firefighting foams

by Cheryl Hogue
October 13, 2018 | APPEARED IN VOLUME 96, ISSUE 41

 

09641-polcon4-foam.jpg
Credit: Elijah Nouvelage/Reuters/Newscom
After a fire alarm malfunctioned, firefighting foam streamed into city streets from a hangar near the San Jose, Calif., airport in 2016.

By 2021, U.S. airports can stop requiring the use of fluorochemicals in firefighting foams, under legislation that President Donald J. Trump signed Oct. 5. A provision in the new law (P.L. 115-254), which renews the authority of the Federal Aviation Administration, is designed to protect drinking water supplies from contamination with poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) that are often ingredients in these foams. Until now, domestic airports had to follow military specifications requiring the use of fluorochemicals in the foams, which are used to suppress liquid fuel fires. “This legislation is a critical first step to allow airports to switch to the less toxic alternatives, which are already being used safely and effectively in other countries,” says Melanie Benesh, an attorney for the advocacy organization Environmental Working Group. The U.S. Department of Defense continues to use foams with fluorochemicals because no commercially available fluorine-free products have met military performance specifications. The U.S. Navy is funding research, development, and testing of fluorine-free foams.

X

Article:

This article has been sent to the following recipient:

Leave A Comment

*Required to comment